Ratliff Jackson LLP | Strategic Legal Advocacy for Life’s Most Critical Moments

CALL US FOR A FREE CONFIDENTIAL CASE EVALUATION (856) 209-3111

Ratliff Jackson LLP logo – New Jersey trial lawyers focused on justice and driven by results.

Contact Us

(856) 209-3111

Ratliff Jackson LLP logo – New Jersey trial lawyers focused on justice and driven by results.
Menu

Prenuptial Agreements

Prenuptial Agreement Lawyers in New Jersey and Pennsylvania

A prenuptial agreement lawyer builds a contract that has to survive scrutiny years later, in a courtroom, by a spouse whose interests have changed. That is the standard we draft to at Ratliff Jackson LLP. A prenuptial agreement is not a form document. It is a written contract, signed before marriage, that allocates property rights, defines what stays separate, and can modify or waive spousal support. New Jersey and Pennsylvania both enforce these agreements, but they do so under different statutes with different failure points. We draft for the state whose law will actually govern, and we document the process so the record supports enforcement rather than undermining it.

Speak with our family law team: (856) 209-3111  |  intake@ratliffjackson.com

What a Prenuptial Agreement Can and Cannot Control

New Jersey law sets out the permissible subject matter of a premarital agreement by statute. Parties may contract regarding their rights and obligations in property wherever located, the right to buy, sell, transfer, encumber, or otherwise manage property, the disposition of property upon separation, dissolution, or death, the modification or elimination of spousal support, the making of a will or trust to carry out the agreement, and other matters not in violation of public policy. See N.J.S.A. 37:2-34.

There is a hard limit. A premarital agreement may not adversely affect a child's right to support. N.J.S.A. 37:2-35. Pennsylvania reaches the same result from a different direction: any provision of a marital agreement regarding child support, visitation, or custody remains subject to modification by the court on a showing of changed circumstances. 23 Pa.C.S. § 3105(b). Language purporting to lock in custody or support is not a bargaining chip. It is a clause a court will disregard, and its presence invites an argument that the drafter overreached.

Issues these agreements are typically built to address

  • Identifying premarital property and keeping it separate, including appreciation and reinvestment during the marriage
  • Ownership, valuation, and control of a closely held business or professional practice
  • Treatment of debt each party brings to the marriage and debt incurred during it
  • Modification, limitation, or waiver of spousal support
  • Protecting an expected inheritance, family trust interest, or gifted property from commingling claims
  • Coordinating property rights at death with the parties' wills, trusts, and beneficiary designations
  • Children from a prior relationship and the estate expectations of those children

How New Jersey Enforces Prenuptial Agreements

New Jersey agreements are governed by the Uniform Premarital and Pre-Civil Union Agreement Act, N.J.S.A. 37:2-31 to 37:2-41. Two provisions do most of the work.

Formalities. The agreement must be in writing, with a statement of assets annexed, signed by both parties, and it is enforceable without consideration. N.J.S.A. 37:2-33. The annexed statement of assets is a statutory requirement, not a best practice. An agreement executed without one has a defect built into it from the moment of signing.

Enforcement. The burden of proof to set aside an agreement falls on the party challenging it, and the standard is clear and convincing evidence. An agreement is unenforceable only if the challenger proves either that the party executed it involuntarily, or that the agreement was unconscionable when it was executed because, before signing, that party was not provided full and fair disclosure of the other party's earnings, property, and financial obligations; did not voluntarily and expressly waive disclosure in writing; did not have and could not reasonably have had adequate knowledge of the other party's property or obligations; or did not consult with independent legal counsel and did not voluntarily and expressly waive that right in writing. Unconscionability is decided by the court as a matter of law, and an agreement is not deemed unconscionable unless those enumerated circumstances apply. N.J.S.A. 37:2-38.

The 2013 amendment matters more than most people realize. P.L. 2013, c. 72 deleted the prior subsection allowing an agreement to be set aside as unconscionable at the time enforcement was sought, and fixed the measuring point at execution. For agreements executed on or after June 27, 2013, a spouse cannot invalidate a prenuptial agreement merely by showing that circumstances changed and the bargain turned out badly. Older agreements are analyzed under the framework in effect when they were signed. If your agreement predates that amendment, the analysis is different and worth reviewing.

How Pennsylvania Enforces Prenuptial Agreements

Pennsylvania has not adopted the Uniform Premarital Agreement Act. Its rule is codified at 23 Pa.C.S. § 3106. The burden is on the party alleging unenforceability, and the standard is again clear and convincing evidence. The challenger must prove either that the party did not execute the agreement voluntarily, or that the party was not provided a fair and reasonable disclosure of the other party's property or financial obligations, did not voluntarily and expressly waive disclosure in writing, and did not have adequate knowledge of the other party's property or financial obligations.

Read the disclosure prong closely. Its three elements are joined conjunctively. A challenger who fails on any one of the three fails on that theory entirely. That drafting choice makes Pennsylvania a demanding forum for a spouse trying to escape an agreement.

Pennsylvania case law reinforces the statute. In Simeone v. Simeone, 525 Pa. 392, 581 A.2d 162 (1990), the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania applied traditional contract principles to prenuptial agreements and rejected judicial inquiry into whether the bargain was reasonable, upholding an agreement signed on the eve of the wedding by a party who had no independent counsel. Later decisions have treated Simeone as controlling on the validity of prenuptial agreements. Independent counsel and unhurried timing remain strongly advisable, but Pennsylvania does not condition enforceability on them the way clients often assume.

Treatment warning. Statutes are amended and decisions are distinguished. The authorities cited on this page were reviewed against primary sources and should be independently confirmed and citator-checked before being relied on in any specific matter. Nothing here is legal advice or a prediction of any outcome.

Where the Two States Diverge

Both states place the burden on the challenger and both use a clear and convincing standard. The differences sit in the details that decide close cases.

New Jersey

  • Statement of assets must be annexed to the agreement itself
  • Retains an unconscionability prong, measured at execution and limited to the statutory circumstances
  • Failure to consult independent counsel without an express written waiver of that right is an enumerated factor
  • Unconscionability is a question of law for the court

Pennsylvania

  • No statutory unconscionability prong in section 3106
  • Disclosure challenge requires all three elements, so any one failure defeats it
  • Contract principles govern under Simeone; the reasonableness of the bargain is not the court's concern
  • Statute applies to agreements executed on or after its effective date

Couples with contacts in both states, or who expect to relocate, should address governing law directly in the document rather than leaving it to be litigated later. New Jersey's statute permits parties to contract regarding other matters not in violation of public policy, and a governing law provision is standard drafting. A choice of law clause does not bind every forum in every circumstance, but its absence guarantees a fight.

How These Agreements Actually Get Attacked

Challenges rarely turn on the substance of the deal. They turn on the process that produced it. The recurring themes are worth understanding before you sign anything.

  1. Timing. An agreement presented days before the ceremony supports a voluntariness argument in either state. The remedy is calendar discipline, not clever drafting.
  2. Incomplete disclosure. A schedule that lists a business but omits its valuation, or lists accounts without balances, is an opening. Both statutes measure disclosure of earnings, property, and financial obligations.
  3. Counsel. One lawyer cannot represent both parties. Where one party proceeds without counsel, the waiver of that right should be express, written, and unambiguous.
  4. Sloppy execution. Missing signatures, unattached schedules, undated amendments. In New Jersey, an amendment or revocation after marriage must itself be in writing and signed by both parties. N.J.S.A. 37:2-37.
  5. Silence on later events. Agreements that never contemplated a business sale, a career pause, or children often generate disputes the drafters could have resolved in a sentence.

Prenuptial Agreements and Estate Rights

A prenuptial agreement that ignores what happens at death is only half drafted. In New Jersey, a surviving spouse's right of election may be waived, wholly or partially, before or after marriage, by a written contract signed by the party waiving after fair disclosure, and a waiver of all rights in the property or estate of a prospective spouse operates as a waiver of the elective share and a renunciation of benefits that would otherwise pass by intestacy or under a prior will. N.J.S.A. 3B:8-10. Pennsylvania likewise permits a spouse to waive the right of election by written agreement under its probate code.

Coordination is the point. A prenuptial agreement, a will, a revocable trust, and beneficiary designations on retirement accounts and life insurance all allocate the same wealth. When they contradict each other, the contradiction surfaces at the worst possible moment. We draft prenuptial agreements with the estate plan in view, and we flag the beneficiary designations that a prenuptial agreement alone will not change.

How We Work

Our prenuptial agreement lawyers represent one party, not the couple. That is a legal requirement, and it is also what makes the agreement defensible. Our work generally includes the following.

  • Assessing whether an agreement is the right instrument, or whether a trust, an entity restructuring, or a postnuptial agreement fits the objective better
  • Building the financial disclosure schedule, including coordination with accountants or valuation professionals where a business or illiquid asset is involved
  • Drafting to the governing state's statutory framework rather than a national template
  • Reviewing and negotiating agreements proposed by the other party's counsel, and identifying the provisions worth contesting
  • Documenting the execution process so the timing, disclosure, and counsel record is complete
  • Reviewing existing agreements, including those executed before New Jersey's 2013 amendment, and preparing amendments where circumstances have changed

Ready to discuss your situation? Call (856) 209-3111 or email intake@ratliffjackson.com

Frequently Asked Questions

A prenuptial agreement lawyer drafts, reviews, and negotiates the contract, and builds the record that supports it. That means structuring the financial disclosure schedule, drafting terms that fit the governing state's statute, advising on which provisions are enforceable and which are not, and managing timing and execution so the process itself does not become the basis for a later challenge. The lawyer represents one party.

New Jersey enforces premarital agreements under the Uniform Premarital and Pre-Civil Union Agreement Act, N.J.S.A. 37:2-31 to 37:2-41. The party challenging the agreement carries the burden and must prove by clear and convincing evidence either involuntary execution or unconscionability at the time of execution based on the specific circumstances listed in N.J.S.A. 37:2-38. Whether a particular agreement holds up depends on its drafting, its disclosure, and the facts surrounding its signing.

Pennsylvania enforces premarital agreements under 23 Pa.C.S. § 3106. The challenger bears the burden and must prove by clear and convincing evidence either that the agreement was not executed voluntarily, or all three elements of the disclosure prong: no fair and reasonable disclosure, no written waiver of disclosure, and no adequate knowledge of the other party's finances. Pennsylvania has not adopted the Uniform Premarital Agreement Act.

Yes. N.J.S.A. 37:2-33 requires that a premarital or pre-civil union agreement be in writing with a statement of assets annexed, signed by both parties. The statute also provides that the agreement is enforceable without consideration. The annexed statement is a statutory formality, and an agreement that lacks one carries a defect from the day it is signed.

No. New Jersey provides that a premarital agreement may not adversely affect a child's right to support. N.J.S.A. 37:2-35. Pennsylvania provides that agreement provisions regarding child support, visitation, or custody remain subject to modification by the court on a showing of changed circumstances. 23 Pa.C.S. § 3105(b). Courts decide those issues based on the child's circumstances at the time, regardless of what a prenuptial agreement says.

One lawyer cannot represent both parties to a prenuptial agreement. In New Jersey, whether a party consulted independent counsel, and whether that party voluntarily and expressly waived the right to do so in writing, is one of the enumerated circumstances a court considers under N.J.S.A. 37:2-38. Pennsylvania does not condition enforceability on independent counsel, but proceeding without it removes a significant point of support for the agreement.

There is no statutory deadline in either state. As a practical matter, agreements presented shortly before the ceremony invite an argument that execution was not voluntary. Beginning the process months in advance leaves room for disclosure, review by each party's own counsel, and negotiation, and it produces a record that is difficult to characterize as rushed.

New Jersey expressly permits parties to contract regarding the modification or elimination of spousal support. N.J.S.A. 37:2-34. Pennsylvania agreements addressing spousal support are analyzed under contract principles and 23 Pa.C.S. § 3106. Whether a particular support provision is enforced depends on the drafting and on the circumstances surrounding execution, so the terms should be negotiated with that scrutiny in mind.

Yes. New Jersey permits a surviving spouse's right of election to be waived, wholly or partially, by written contract signed by the waiving party after fair disclosure. N.J.S.A. 3B:8-10. Pennsylvania similarly permits waiver of the right of election by written agreement. A prenuptial agreement should be coordinated with the will, any trusts, and beneficiary designations, because those instruments allocate the same assets and can contradict one another.

A prenuptial agreement does not become void because the couple relocates, but the question of which state's law governs can be litigated. The agreement can address this directly through a governing law provision, which is standard drafting. A court in a new forum applies its own conflict of laws rules, so a governing law clause reduces uncertainty rather than eliminating it. Agreements with contacts in more than one state should be drafted with that in mind.

Yes. Under N.J.S.A. 37:2-37, after marriage a premarital or pre-civil union agreement may be amended or revoked only by a written agreement signed by the parties, and the amendment or revocation is enforceable without consideration. Oral modifications and informal understandings do not satisfy that requirement. Where circumstances have changed substantially, a postnuptial agreement is sometimes the better instrument.

A prenuptial agreement is executed before marriage and becomes effective upon marriage. A postnuptial agreement is executed after the marriage has taken place. The subject matter overlaps substantially, but the legal frameworks differ, and a postnuptial agreement is not analyzed under the premarital agreement statutes in the same way. Which instrument fits depends on where you are in the timeline and what you are trying to accomplish.

Related Family Law Services

Resources

Talk to a Prenuptial Agreement Lawyer

The value of a prenuptial agreement is measured years after it is signed, by whether it does what the parties intended when someone has a reason to challenge it. That outcome is built during drafting: complete disclosure, independent representation, careful timing, and terms written to the governing statute. If you are considering an agreement, reviewing one that has been proposed to you, or reassessing an agreement signed years ago, we are prepared to advise you.

Ratliff Jackson LLP  |  (856) 209-3111  |  intake@ratliffjackson.com

This page is general information about New Jersey and Pennsylvania law and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every matter depends on its own facts.

Other Practice Areas of Family

Scroll to Top